Security & Risk

Integrated Risk Management

Make risk-informed decisions and increase efficiency with integrated risk management.

Capabilities

What Integrated Risk Management covers.

Policy & Compliance Management

Automate policy lifecycles and continuously monitor for compliance. Regulatory requirement mapping with automated acknowledgments.

  • Automated lifecycles
  • Continuous monitoring
  • Regulatory mapping

Risk Management

Fine-grained business impact analysis. Prioritize and respond to risks with real-time business context.

  • Impact analysis
  • Risk prioritization
  • Business context

Audit Management

Risk-based audit scoping and planning. Cross-functional automation that eliminates spreadsheet-driven audits.

  • Risk-based scoping
  • Cross-functional
  • No spreadsheets

Operational Resilience

Real-time visibility into resilience of technology, people, processes, and facilities. Manage business disruptions proactively.

  • Real-time visibility
  • 4-corner resilience
  • Disruption management

Regulatory Change Management

Integration with leading regulatory content providers. Automated change tracking and compliance impact assessment.

  • Content integration
  • Auto-change tracking
  • Impact assessment
What delivery looks like

Four phases. You see working configuration in every one.

We don't publish a week count here — the honest answer depends on your instance, your data, and how many systems are in scope. You get a specific timeline in the written plan after scoping.

01

Assess

  • Risk & compliance maturity audit
  • Policy & control framework mapping
  • Regulatory requirement inventory
02

Build

  • Platform configuration & taxonomy
  • Policy & compliance workflow setup
  • Risk assessment & scoring configuration
03

Integrate

  • Regulatory content integration
  • Audit automation & reporting
  • Operational resilience setup
04

Optimize

  • Performance analytics & dashboards
  • Continuous control monitoring
  • Quarterly risk posture reviews
Where these go wrong

A control library nobody owns.

IRM implementations fail quietly. The tool goes live, controls and risks are loaded, and then nothing changes — because the control library was imported from a framework document rather than mapped to how the organisation actually operates, and no named person owns any of it. Two quarters later the risk register is stale, evidence is still collected by email before each audit, and the platform is a place where reports are generated rather than where risk is managed.

Tell us where you are
Decisions you will face
What is the authoritative source for your control set?
A framework, an internal policy set, or a regulator's requirements — and if more than one, which wins when they conflict. Without this decided, the control library becomes a superset nobody can attest to.
Which evidence can be collected automatically?
Controls whose evidence comes from platform data — access reviews, change approvals, patch state — are worth automating first, because they stop being manual work permanently. Controls that need human attestation stay manual, and pretending otherwise creates false assurance.
Who owns a risk, and what happens when they leave?
Ownership without succession is how a register goes stale. This is a governance decision the platform can enforce but not make.
How we run it

Built to be handed over.

See managed services
  • Configuration documentation
    What was built, why, and where the decisions are recorded.
  • Admin and runbook training
    For the people who will own it after go-live.
  • Update-set and repo history
    A traceable record rather than an undocumented instance.
  • A named escalation path
    The same engineers, not a ticket queue.
FAQ

Integrated Risk Management, answered.

Ask yours directly

It replaces siloed GRC spreadsheets with a connected programme — controls, risks, continuous monitoring and evidence collection in one place. These implementations rarely fail loudly; they go live and then nothing changes, because the control library was imported from a framework document rather than mapped to how the organisation runs, and no named person owns any of it. Ownership is the design decision that matters most.

Want this on your instance?

Tell us where you are today — greenfield, mid-implementation, or inheriting someone else's build. You'll have a written plan inside two working days.